Rethinking Global Economic Systems: A Unified Framework of Inequality, Sustainability, and Institutional Evolution
DOI:
10.47353/ijema.v3i7.310Published:
2025-12-31Downloads
Abstract
This study develops a unified conceptual framework to rethink global economic systems by integrating three critical dimensions: inequality, sustainability, and institutional evolution. Existing economic paradigms have largely treated these dimensions in isolation, resulting in fragmented policy approaches and limited explanatory power in addressing contemporary global challenges. This paper argues that the persistent rise in inequality, coupled with environmental degradation and institutional inefficiencies, reflects a systemic imbalance embedded within the current global economic architecture. Drawing on interdisciplinary insights from economics, institutional theory, and sustainability studies, this research adopts a qualitative conceptual approach to synthesize existing theoretical perspectives. The proposed framework conceptualizes global economic systems as dynamic and co-evolving structures in which distributional outcomes, environmental constraints, and institutional arrangements are interdependent. The analysis highlights how unequal resource allocation undermines sustainability goals, while weak institutional evolution constrains inclusive economic transformation. The study contributes to the literature by offering a holistic and integrative model that bridges the gap between growth-oriented and sustainability-oriented paradigms. It further provides a foundation for rethinking policy design by emphasizing the need for systemic alignment across economic, environmental, and institutional dimensions. The findings suggest that achieving long-term global stability requires a transition toward inclusive, adaptive, and sustainability-driven economic systems..
Keywords:
Global economic systems Inequality Sustainability Institutional evolutionReferences
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown Publishing.
Aghion, P., Caroli, E., & García-Peñalosa, C. (1999). Inequality and economic growth: The perspective of the new growth theories. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(4), 1615–1660. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.37.4.1615
Arrow, K. J., Dasgupta, P., & Mäler, K.-G. (2003). Evaluating projects and assessing sustainable development in imperfect economies. Environmental and Resource Economics, 26(4), 647–685. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EARE.0000007357.78828.98
Atkinson, A. B. (2015). Inequality: What can be done? Harvard University Press.
Bansal, P., & Song, H.-C. (2017). Similar but not the same: Differentiating corporate sustainability from corporate responsibility. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 105–149. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0095
Bardhan, P. (2005). Scarcity, conflicts, and cooperation: Essays in the political and institutional economics of development. MIT Press.
Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Levine, R. (2007). Finance, inequality and the poor. Journal of Economic Growth, 12(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-007-9010-6
Berg, A., Ostry, J. D., & Tsangarides, C. G. (2014). Redistribution, inequality, and growth. IMF Staff Discussion Note. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484358443.006
Bowles, S. (2012). The new economics of inequality and redistribution. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/ber050
Dasgupta, P. (2007). Measuring sustainable development: Theory and application. Asian Development Review, 24(1), 1–10.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Dixit, A. (2009). Governance institutions and economic activity. American Economic Review, 99(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.1.5
Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2004). Trade, growth, and poverty. The Economic Journal, 114(493), F22–F49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0013-0133.2004.00186.x
Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1257–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford University Press.
Gygli, S., Haelg, F., Potrafke, N., & Sturm, J.-E. (2019). The KOF globalisation index revisited. Review of International Organizations, 14, 543–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09344-2
Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity without growth: Economics for a finite planet. Earthscan.
Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review, 45(1), 1–28.
Mazzucato, M. (2018). The value of everything: Making and taking in the global economy. Penguin.
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. (1972). The limits to growth. Universe Books.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
North, D. C. (2005). Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton University Press.
Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133
Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Harvard University Press.
Polanyi, K. (1944). The great transformation. Beacon Press.
Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut economics: Seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. Chelsea Green Publishing.
Rodrik, D. (2011). The globalization paradox: Democracy and the future of the world economy. W.W. Norton.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. W.W. Norton.
Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Report on the measurement of economic performance and social progress.
Stern, N. (2007). The economics of climate change: The Stern review. Cambridge University Press.
Williamson, O. E. (2000). The new institutional economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 595–613. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.3.595
World Bank. (2020). World development report 2020: Trading for development in the age of global value chains.
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Raden Rudi Alhempi, Supaphorn Akkapin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
