The Economics of Uncertainty: A New Theoretical Framework for Decision-Making in a Volatile World
DOI:
10.47353/ijema.v3i8.236Published:
2026-01-31Downloads
Abstract
This study develops a new theoretical framework for understanding economic decision-making under conditions of persistent uncertainty. Traditional economic models largely assume rational agents operating in stable environments with predictable risks, thereby limiting their applicability in today’s volatile and complex global economy. Increasing economic turbulence—driven by financial instability, technological disruption, and geopolitical uncertainty—has exposed the limitations of risk-based models and highlighted the need for a broader conceptualization of uncertainty. Adopting a qualitative conceptual approach, this study synthesizes insights from behavioral economics, institutional theory, and complexity economics to construct an integrative framework. The proposed model distinguishes between risk, ambiguity, and deep uncertainty, emphasizing that decision-making processes vary significantly across these conditions. It conceptualizes economic agents as adaptive decision-makers who rely not only on optimization but also on heuristics, learning, and institutional context. The framework identifies three key dimensions influencing decision-making under uncertainty: cognitive adaptation, structural constraints, and institutional guidance. These dimensions interact dynamically, shaping both individual and organizational responses to uncertainty. The study argues that uncertainty is not merely a constraint but also a driver of innovation, strategic flexibility, and systemic transformation. This research contributes to the literature by advancing a unified theory of economic decision-making under uncertainty, moving beyond traditional equilibrium-based models. It provides a foundation for future empirical research and offers policy-relevant insights for managing uncertainty in an increasingly volatile global economy.
Keywords:
Economic uncertainty Decision-making Behavioral economics Complexity economicsReferences
Akerlof, G. A., & Shiller, R. J. (2009). Animal spirits: How human psychology drives the economy. Princeton University Press.
Arrow, K. J. (1965). Aspects of the theory of risk-bearing. Yrjö Jahnsson Lectures.
Arthur, W. B. (1999). Complexity and the economy. Science, 284(5411), 107–109. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5411.107
Arthur, W. B. (2013). Complexity economics: A different framework for economic thought. Santa Fe Institute.
Beckert, J. (2016). Imagined futures: Fictional expectations and capitalist dynamics. Harvard University Press.
Bernanke, B. S. (1983). Irreversibility, uncertainty, and cyclical investment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.2307/1885568
Camerer, C. F., & Weber, M. (1992). Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 325–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122575
Colander, D., Holt, R., & Rosser, J. B. (2004). The changing face of mainstream economics. Review of Political Economy, 16(4), 485–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/0953825042000256702
Dequech, D. (2000). Fundamental uncertainty and ambiguity. Eastern Economic Journal, 26(1), 41–60.
Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75(4), 643–669. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884324
Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 451–482. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346
Gilboa, I., & Schmeidler, D. (1989). Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 18(2), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4068(89)90018-9
Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Rationality for mortals: How people cope with uncertainty. Oxford University Press.
Hansen, L. P., & Sargent, T. J. (2008). Robustness. Princeton University Press.
Heiner, R. A. (1983). The origin of predictable behavior. American Economic Review, 73(4), 560–595.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Houghton Mifflin.
Lucas, R. E. (1976). Econometric policy evaluation: A critique. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series, 1, 19–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2231(76)80003-6
Manski, C. F. (2013). Public policy in an uncertain world. Harvard University Press.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
North, D. C. (2005). Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton University Press.
Ormerod, P. (1998). Butterfly economics. Faber & Faber.
Rodrik, D. (2015). Economics rules: The rights and wrongs of the dismal science. W.W. Norton.
Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics. Wiley.
Shackle, G. L. S. (1972). Epistemics and economics. Cambridge University Press.
Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852
Simon, H. A. (1972). Theories of bounded rationality. Decision and Organization.
Taleb, N. N. (2007). The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable. Random House.
Taleb, N. N. (2012). Antifragile: Things that gain from disorder. Random House.
Tetlock, P. E., & Gardner, D. (2015). Superforecasting. Crown Publishing.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122574
Weitzman, M. L. (2009). On modeling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change. Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.91.1.1
Williamson, O. E. (2000). The new institutional economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 595–613. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.3.595
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nti Frank Paul Mathews, George Kushiator

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.








