Optimizing Decision-Making in Higher Education Institutions through AI-Driven Business Intelligence in the Digital Era

Authors

  • Maxsi Ary Universitas Adhirajasa Reswara Sanjaya, Indonesia
  • Rian Andriani Universitas Adhirajasa Reswara Sanjaya, Indonesia
  • Willma Fauzzia Akpar BSI Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47353/ijema.v3i3.328

Keywords:

Acceptance Model, Artificial Intelligence, Business Intelligence, Decision-Making, Digital Transformation, Higher Education, Technology

Abstract

Digital transformation in higher education requires institutions to adopt intelligent technologies that support more accurate and data-driven decision-making. This study investigates the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into Business Intelligence (BI) systems within Indonesian universities using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) as the theoretical framework. A mixed-methods approach was employed, involving surveys (n = 75) and interviews with academic leaders and information technology (IT) staff. The results show that AI-enhanced BI systems significantly improve decision-making effectiveness, particularly in academic planning and administrative efficiency. Regression analysis revealed that perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use explained 58% of the variance in decision effectiveness, while all variables combined (including management support and digital literacy) accounted for 69%. These findings validate the TAM in the context of AI-based decision systems in education. This study contributes both theoretically and practically by offering evidence-based recommendations for strengthening data-driven culture and institutional readiness for adopting intelligent information systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chatti, M. A., Dyckhoff, A. L., Schroeder, U., & Thüs, H. (2012). A reference model for learning analytics. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5/6), 318. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2012.051815

Chaudhuri, S., Dayal, U., & Narasayya, V. (2011). An overview of business intelligence technology. Communications of the ACM, 54(8), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978542.1978562

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Del Vecchio, P., Di Minin, A., Petruzzelli, A. M., Panniello, U., & Pirri, S. (2018). Big data for open innovation in SMEs and large corporations: Trends, opportunities, and challenges. Creativity and Innovation Management, 27(1), 6–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12224

Gandomi, A., & Haider, M. (2015). Beyond the hype: Big data concepts, methods, and analytics. International Journal of Information Management, 35(2), 137–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.10.007

Nugroho, A. W., & Utama, A. A. G. S. (2025). Business intelligence systems and their impact on organizational decision-making and performance outcomes: Literature review. Owner, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v9i2.2646

Ramadhan, D., Budiatmo, A., & Prihatini, A. E. (2024). The influence of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on actual system use (A study of BNI mobile application users in Salatiga City). Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Bisnis, 13(3), 620–628. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jiab

Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2010). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall PEARSON.

Sharma, R., Mithas, S., & Kankanhalli, A. (2014). Transforming decision-making processes: A research agenda for understanding the impact of business analytics on organizations. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(4), 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.17

Shollo, A., & Galliers, R. D. (2016). Towards an understanding of the role of business intelligence systems in organizational knowing. Information Systems Journal, 26(4), 339–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12071

Sorour, A., Atkins, A. S., Stanier, C. F., & Alharbi, F. D. (2020). The role of business intelligence and analytics in higher education quality: A proposed architecture. In 2019 International Conference on Advanced Emergency Computing Technologies (AECT). https://doi.org/10.1109/AECT47998.2020.9194157

Ward, S. (2022). Market orientation – Does it exist in Australian universities?

Wang, Y., Kung, L., & Byrd, T. A. (2018). Big data analytics: Understanding its capabilities and potential benefits for healthcare organizations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 126, 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.12.019

Yeboah, A. (2023). Knowledge sharing in organizations: A systematic review. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2195027

Al-Debei, M. M., & Avison, D. (2010). Developing a unified framework of the business model concept. European Journal of Information Systems, 19(3), 359–376. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2010.21

Baker, R. S., & Inventado, P. S. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics. In J. A. Larusson & B. White (Eds.), Learning analytics (pp. 61–75). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3305-7_4

Brynjolfsson, E., Hitt, L. M., & Kim, H. H. (2011). Strength in numbers: How does data-driven decisionmaking affect firm performance? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1819486

Downloads

Published

2025-08-05

How to Cite

Ary, M., Andriani, R., & Fauzzia, W. (2025). Optimizing Decision-Making in Higher Education Institutions through AI-Driven Business Intelligence in the Digital Era. International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting (IJEMA), 3(3), 221–229. https://doi.org/10.47353/ijema.v3i3.328

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.