The Hegemony of Social, Cultural, and Discourse Power Indonesian Language Literary Criticism Course Materials
Main Article Content
Muhammad Amien Denis
Siti Gomo Attas
Miftahulkhairah Anwar
One class dominates or is supported across numerous social aspects in hegemony. This study used critical discourse analysis to analyze data. This research aimed to analyze social hegemony in Indonesian literary criticism course materials. Thus, this study formulated problems as follows. (1) Social hegemony in Indonesian literary criticism course materials. (2) Persuasive cultural hegemony in Indonesian literary criticism course materials (3) Power hegemony in Indonesian literary criticism textbooks. In Indonesian literary criticism course materials, discursive practices, social identity, and social interaction are dialectical. Literary discourse is examined from three angles: the text, discourse practices, and the socio-cultural setting. Literary discourse as a manifestation of social interaction, its ability to regulate or manipulate behavior and material existence, and its role in establishing and maintaining power, status, and social roles are examined in the context of social hegemony. Critical examination of literary discourse in Indonesian literary criticism course materials is possible by considering cultural hegemony. According to the first assumption, symbols create meaning. b) Indonesian literary criticism textbooks link knowledge to values. Indonesian literary criticism course materials include cultural discourse from several fields. The hegemony of power is examined in Indonesian literary criticism course materials. a) Authority affects daily life. Power is coercive. Indonesian literary criticism course materials allow readers to criticize and disrupt social, cultural, and authority systems through literary discourse.
Anggini, W. Y., Attas, S. G., & Harmoko, D. D. (2022). Hegemoni Kekuasaan pada Festival Budaya Dongdang Kabupaten Bogor. Khasanah Ilmu - Jurnal Pariwisata Dan Budaya, 13(2), 93–98. https://doi.org/10.31294/khi.v13i2.11857
Ansoriyah, S., & Irawan, I. N. (2022). Penulisan Karya Ilmiah dalam Jaringan Bagi Guru Bahasa Indonesia. JMM (Jurnal Masyarakat Mandiri), 6(1), 81. https://doi.org/10.31764/jmm.v6i1.6076
Ansoriyah, S., Irawan, I. N., & Attas, S. G. (2023). Keterampilan Membaca Sastra Melalui Metode Quantum Teaching Bagi Remaja Masjid. JMM (Jurnal Masyarakat Mandiri), 7(3), 2042. https://doi.org/10.31764/jmm.v7i3.14110
Anwar, Mi. (2010). Wahhabi Versus Islam Liberal: Pembacaan Analisis Wacana Kritis Teks "Rendah diri Kaum Wahhabi. Jurnal bahasa dan sastra, 10(15), 1–9.
Attas, S. G., Yarmi, G., & Darwin, D. (2021). Minat Baca Cerpen terhadap Pemahaman Struktur Cerpen yang Baik dan Benar Pembaca Rubrik Cerpen Portal Basabasi.Co. Jurnal Ilmiah SEMANTIKA, 2(02), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.46772/semantika.v2i02.381
Chitty, C. (2020). Sexual Hegemony. In Sexual Hegemony. Duke University Press Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv14t48nh
Donoghue, M. (2018). Beyond Hegemony: Elaborating on the Use of Gramscian Concepts in Critical Discourse Analysis for Political Studies. Political Studies, 66(2), 392–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321717722362
Dremel, A., & Matić, R. (2014). Discourse and/as social practice – The analysis of the problem of resistance and hegemony. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(22), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n22p155
Fadli, M. R. (2021). Memahami Desain Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. HUMANIKA, 21(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i1.38075
Handayani, W., Lustyantie, N., & Zuriyanti, Z. (2021). Popular Culture and Hegemony in Novel Everything Everything (A Discourse Analysis). JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(8), 760–772. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v4i8.340
Handayani, W., Rasyid, Y., & Anwar, M. (2022). Wacana Bukan Muhrim pada Tayangan Video Cokro TV (Sebuah Analisis Wacana Kritis). JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan), 6(1), 1931–1943. https://doi.org/10.58258/jisip.v6i1.2698
Irawan, I. N., Ansoriyah, S., & Rafli, Z. (2020). Terjemahan Beranotasi Teks Pedoman Pelayanan Perizinan Berusaha Terintegrasi Secara Elektronik (OSS) ke dalam Bahasa Inggris. JARTIKA Jurnal Riset Teknologi dan Inovasi Pendidikan. https://doi.org/10.36765/jartika.v3i2.306
Leiliyanti, E., Irawan, I. N., & Syahputra, Z. (2021). Pelatihan Membaca Kritis / Literasi Kritis Teks Naratif Bagi Guru SMP Pendidik Penggerak Indonesia Jaya. JMM (Jurnal Masyarakat Mandiri), 5(1).
Lephen, P. (2021). Tinular Tutur : Audio Drama Media Counter Hegemony Ruler of The New Order (Analysis of Critical Discourse). Dance and Theatre Review, 4(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.24821/dtr.v4i1.4977
Macedo, D., Dendrinos, B., & Gounari, P. (2015). Hegemony of English. In Hegemony of English (2 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315634159
Macgilchrist, F., & Van Hout, T. (2011). Ethnographic Discourse Analysis and Social Science. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1), 1–21. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1600/3107
MacKenzie, I. (2002). Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change. Contemporary Political Theory, 1(1), 133–134. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave/cpt/9300011
Rahmania, S. A. (2022). Nahdlatul Ulama’s Ideological Hegemony in Nadirsyah Hosen’s Oration: A Critical Discourse Analysis. LITE, 18(1), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.33633/lite.v18i1.5737
Somantri, G. R. (2005). Memahami Metode Kualitatif. Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia, 9(2), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.7454/mssh.v9i2.122
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. In Jurnal Binawakya. Alfabeta.
Weissenrieder, M., & Fairclough, N. (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. The Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 428. https://doi.org/10.2307/329335
Wing-Chun Ng, T. (2020). Recontextualisation of Beijing’s voice: A critical discourse analysis of hegemony and resistance in Hong Kong political discourse. Discourse and Society, 31(5), 540–561. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926520914683
Wullweber, J. (2019). Constructing Hegemony in Global Politics. A Discourse–Theoretical Approach to Policy Analysis. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 41(2), 148–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2018.1512339
